What's in a name? Pure evil.

When I'm Supreme Ruler of All I Survey, the first thing I'll do is confiscate a great deal of wealth for my own personal pleasure. (I'd like to pretend I'm a better person than this, but hey, I'm Supreme Ruler and that means perks, baby.) Some time shortly thereafter, I'll get down to the business of making everybody's lives much better with my second order of business: I shall forbid congress to name their bills.

No names, not ever. Date-time stamp them ("House Bill 200802131306"), or assign them ascending prime numbers ("Senate Bill 6637"), or maybe even just use whatever numbering system you already have in place, but don't tack on any helpful descriptions, thank you very much. I don't care if that makes individual pieces of legislation difficult to distinguish; every last one of you congressional types have laptops and assistants and freaking pens and paper, so take some notes and sort it out.

The problem with giving bills nicknames is that politicians, clever and resourceful creatures that they are, have a talent for naming their bills in a manner that makes other politicians look like assholes for voting them down:

...You don't want military recruiters to have greater access to our children and their personal information? That's all well and good, but you'll have to vote against the No Child Left Behind Act... and that makes you a bad person who wants to leave children behind. Look, voters: see those children wandering around the parking lot, panicked and crying? It's 'cause this guy voted to leave them behind!

...Want to prevent potentially abusive wiretapping of American citizens? All right, but that makes you an opponent of the Patriot Act, not to mention the Protect America Act. That's right: I said you're anti-patriotic person who wants to leave Americans unprotected, you damn dirty commie!

...You think restrictions on firearms infringe on important constitutional rights? Well, that's your opinion, but I hope you're prepared to vote down the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act. Of course, a "no" vote on this means you A) absolutely adore handgun violence, and B) think that Jim Brady deserves to be confined to a wheelchair. You just hate cripples, don't you?

If bills were designated only by ugly chunks of nondescriptive text, legislators and their constituents wouldn't get hung up on the emotional baggage of words like "Children" and "Protect" and "Freedom" and "Puppies" (you do remember the "Vote For This Or You Hate Little Puppies Act" of 1986, don't you?). Congress could finally debate and vote for bills solely on the content of the proposed law.

(For the record, the last law with a name would be the "Okay, I Officially Declare An End To Naming Bills, But Not Until After This Bill Is Signed Into Law" law of 2008).